Why Newsom Said No to These Bills


Here’s a have a look at the failed proposals and why Newsom vetoed them:

Assembly Bill 1238: Decriminalizing jaywalking

This invoice would have eliminated fines for crossing the road exterior of a crosswalk until there’s imminent hazard. Supporters mentioned that the police used jaywalking legal guidelines as pretext to detain folks for no good purpose.

But Newsom nervous the legislation might unintentionally enhance the state’s already excessive charge of pedestrian fatalities.

He wrote in his veto that he was dedicated to engaged on laws “that addresses the unequal enforcement of jaywalking laws in a manner that does not risk worsening California’s pedestrian safety.”

A.B. 122: Allowing cyclists to roll by cease indicators

Newsom additionally made a security argument for this invoice, which might have allowed cyclists to deal with cease indicators as yields. Supporters had mentioned it was a commonsense measure that’s already been put into place in other parts of the country.

But the governor said he feared that the laws supposed to enhance bicyclist security would have “the opposite effect.”

A.B. 123: Boosting family-leave funds

This invoice would have elevated how a lot cash employees obtain whereas taking paid household depart. Currently, the funds are too small for low-wage employees to afford to benefit from the profit, CalMatters reports.

But in his veto message, Newsom mentioned the growth would create important new prices for employees and the state.

The invoice’s creator, Assemblywoman Lorena Gonzalez, responded in a press release: “Until we make reforms to the program, low- and middle-income families will continue to be left behind, while their tax dollars subsidize paid family leave for higher-income workers.”

A.B. 1456: Expanding school monetary help

This measure would have considerably loosened eligibility necessities for school monetary help in order that tens of 1000’s of further college students might obtain help.

But Newsom deemed the proposal, anticipated to price between $85 million to $175 million a yr, too expensive. In his veto, he urged that such a change be made by the annual budgeting course of.

A.B. 616: Allowing farmworkers to vote to unionize by mail

Under this measure, farmworkers would have been in a position to mail in or drop off poll playing cards for union elections with the California Agricultural Labor Relations Board workplace, as a substitute of getting to vote in individual.

Newsom vetoed the bill due to what he known as “various inconsistencies and procedural issues” and mentioned he would work to develop new laws to assist defend agricultural employees’ proper to collectively cut price.

Unions are linked to increased wages and higher advantages, but nearly no farmworkers are unionized, CalMatters reports. The governor’s resolution upset many farmworkers who supported him within the recall.

Senate Bill 660: Barring paid signature gathering

This invoice most likely would have made it tougher for initiatives and recall makes an attempt to qualify for the poll, such because the one which Newsom survived last month.

But in his veto, Newsom mentioned that paying signature gatherers based mostly on what number of signatures they receive is essentially the most inexpensive approach for folks to get measures on the poll: Banning the apply “could therefore make the qualification of many initiatives cost-prohibitive for all but the wealthiest interests.”

Other proposals vetoed embody:


This yr’s largest blaze, the Dixie fireplace, created its personal climate. We show you in 3-D.


This broccoli and Cheddar soup.



A new book by Adam Schiff, a Democratic congressman from California.


I’m headed to San Diego quickly to do some reporting. What ought to I write about?

Email me strategies at CAtoday@nytimes.com.


Monarch butterflies, which usually migrate to the West Coast forward of winter, as soon as numbered within the tens of millions in California. But final yr, fewer than 2,000 had been discovered alongside the state’s coast.

In latest months, nonetheless, environmental teams have noticed extra of the distinctive orange-and-black butterflies than they did in 2020, USA Today reports.

“These are very early numbers, so we need to be cautious to not read too much into this,” Scott Hoffman Black, government director of the conservation group Xerces Society, advised the information outlet. “But the numbers do lend some hope that we could see a slight rebound.”



Source link