Capitol Police whistleblower delivers scathing rebuke to two of its senior leaders on Jan. 6

The whistleblower’s criticism went past Capitol Police leaders to Congress. Without naming particular lawmakers, his letter accuses congressional leaders of having “purposefully failed” to inform the reality in regards to the division’s failures.

POLITICO obtained the letter detailing the allegations, which is circulating amongst Capitol Police officers, and is publishing parts of it right here. To shield the whistleblower’s id, POLITICO isn’t publishing the letter in full.

“The truth may be valued less than politics by many members of the congressional community to include those that have made decisions about the leadership of the USCP post January 6th, but I believe the truth still matters to real people and certainly the men and women of the U.S. Capitol Police,” the whistleblower wrote.

A spokesperson for the Capitol Police despatched an announcement in response to the letter that begins: A lot has changed since January 6. Although there is more work to do, many of the problems described in the letter have been addressed.”

The spokesperson added that the division “has implemented, and continues to implement, many of the critical recommendations called for in” a Senate inquiry into Jan. 6, a separate evaluation carried out by retired Lt. Gen. Russel Honoré, and a number of probes by its personal inspector common.

“The letter from the former employee echoes the thoughtful recommendations in those reports,” the Capitol Police spokesperson continued. “USCP leaders, under new Chief Tom Manger, are committed to learning from prior mistakes and protecting our brave officers, who fought valiantly on January 6, so we can continue to carry out the Department’s critical mission. The men and women of this Department are committed to that critical mission. Our goal is to work as a team, to move forward, and advance the work that keeps the U.S. Capitol and the people who work here safe.”

The letter was despatched to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, Senate Majority Leader Chuck Schumer, Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell and House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy. The House Administration Committee’s Republican employees was additionally despatched a replica.

The whistleblower accused Pittman of mendacity to Congress a few key intelligence report the division acquired in late December. That report famous {that a} weblog known as “” posted a map of the Capitol campus, and that commenters on the location known as for protesters to carry weapons and confront members of Congress on Jan. 6.

Pittman instructed congressional investigators in April {that a} cohort of senior officers within the division had been additionally conscious of that intelligence earlier than the assault. The whistleblower claimed in his letter, nevertheless, that different officers didn’t obtain the intelligence report, and that Pittman lied when she mentioned they did.

“These officials were the only officials that had all the intelligence information for the 6th,” the whistleblower wrote, relating to Gallagher and Pittman.

“The single most important piece of intelligence information … was never shared with any members of USCP leadership,” the whistleblower added, asking: “Why did they approve the operational plan for the 6th if they knew the intelligence?”

A senior legislation enforcement official mentioned that different folks within the division really did have the intelligence, however that it clearly ought to have been distributed extra broadly. The Capitol Police spokesperson disputed the allegation that Pittman lied to Congress and famous that the division has modified its inner and exterior intelligence-sharing practices as a result of of the assault.

However, the report in query wasn’t the one key piece of intelligence that didn’t attain the fitting folks within the division, in accordance to the whistleblower. Gallagher and Pittman additionally had data exhibiting teams that acquired permits to maintain occasions surrounding the Capitol on Jan. 6 had been all entrance operations for Stop the Steal, the whistleblower wrote.

Stop the Steal was a motion selling the conspiracy idea that nefarious forces stole the election from Trump. The motion’s organizers promoted a rally on the National Mall that preceded the assault on the Capitol.

That was “game changing information,” the whistleblower added, however operational commanders — which means, the legislation enforcement officers within the area supervising police exercise — by no means realized about it.

In the whistleblower’s view, Gallagher and Pittman had all of the intelligence wanted to justify demanding reinforcements from the National Guard, closing the doorways to the Capitol and utilizing harder however less-than-lethal weapons on the morning of Jan. 6. But they didn’t share that intelligence with the fitting folks, the whistleblower wrote, and as an alternative accredited a woefully insufficient safety plan.

The whistleblower additionally mentioned he spent hours through the assault within the Capitol Police’s Command Center with Pittman and Gallagher, claiming that they did little to cease the violence. The whistleblower’s presence within the command middle on Jan. 6 was confirmed by two different legislation enforcement officers and a 3rd one that was there through the assault.

Those three folks gave completely different accounts of how lengthy the whistleblower was there. One of the folks mentioned he was there for six hours, one other mentioned he was there for “several” hours and a 3rd mentioned he was there for lower than two hours.

“What I observed was them mostly sitting there, blankly looking at the TV screens showing real time footage of officers and officials fighting for the Congress and their lives,” the whistleblower wrote.

“It is my allegation that these two with intent and malice opted to not try and assist the officers and officials, blame others for the failures, and chose to try and use this event for their own personal promotions,” he added. “This was done not after the even[t] but while officers and officials were still fighting the demonstrators.”

They watched “mostly with their hands in their laps,” he added, and “did not try to help or assist as officers and officials were literally fighting for each other, their lives and the Congress.”

The two legislation enforcement official who confirmed Pittman and Gallagher’s presence within the command middle disputed the declare that they passively watched the assaults. Those officers mentioned Gallagher centered on bringing in assist from the National Guard and legislation enforcement companions, and that Pittman centered on the evacuation and safety of members of Congress and the vice chairman.

The whistleblower, nevertheless, wrote that officers and officers have resigned from the division en masse as a result of Pittman and Gallagher haven’t been held accountable for what occurred that day.

“This concerted effort to protect the two members of the Department without question the most responsible for the tragic events of January 6th is repulsive,” the whistleblower wrote.

And the whistleblower lambasted congressional management for letting Gallagher and Pittman preserve their senior roles within the police division at the same time as a brand new chief took over on the Capitol Police.

“[I]t is immensely embarrassing to the congressional leadership and staff that they selected the two individuals most responsible for the 6th to lead the Department after the 6th,” he wrote in his conclusion. “Especially since some entity selected them without any investigation. To hold them accountable would require this same group to admit they were wrong.”

Source link